Metacognitive Disparities among Similar Learners: A Study on Learning Styles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.5060Keywords:
Combinatorics, Felder-Silverman, Learning Strategies, Learning Style, Metacognitive KnowledgeAbstract
Metacognitive ability plays a crucial role in the Combinatorics course, which requires a deep understanding of concepts and complex problem-solving strategies. This study aims to examine the relationship between the Felder-Silverman learning style model and students' metacognitive knowledge in the context of the Combinatorics course. The primary focus is on analyzing metacognitive gaps among students with similar learning styles. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through learning style questionnaires, open-ended questions, semi-structured interviews, and participatory observations of four students with diverse academic backgrounds and learning styles. The findings indicate that although two students share the same learning style combination (active, sensing, visual, and sequential), their level of metacognitive knowledge differs significantly. One student demonstrated strong declarative, procedural, and conditional understanding, while the other could only theoretically identify strategies without concrete implementation. This difference suggests that learning styles are not always the sole predictor of metacognitive achievement. Factors such as self-reflection, emotional regulation, and active learning habits also influence the effectiveness of learning strategy implementation. These findings challenge conventional views on the linear correlation between learning styles and metacognition and offer new insights into the design of learning approaches that integrate learning styles and reflective abilities in a more adaptive and personalized manner.
References
Abdelshiheed, M., Hostetter, J. W., Barnes, T., & Chi, M. (2023). Bridging Declarative, Procedural, and Conditional Metacognitive Knowledge Gap Using Deep Reinforcement Learning [North Carolina State University]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11739
Alemdağ, C. (2020). Changes in learning style preferences of physical education students. CEPS Journal, 10(4), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.613
Allo, E. L., Permanasari, A., Redjeki, S., & Wiji, W. (2019). The Development of Rubric to Assess Metacognition Knowledge. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 253(3), 549–552. https://doi.org/10.2991/aes-18.2019.122
Casinillo, L. F. (2023). Regression model for students’ learning style in distance statistics education. EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 10(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejsmt.vol10.1.8.2023
Cayetano, H., & Ibarra, F. P. (2024). Projecting Learning Styles and Metacognitive Awareness as Predictors of Problem-Solving Abilities in Mathematics Among Elementary Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 24(12), 8–26.
Firmanto, A., Hitipeuw, I., Pali, M., & Hanurawan, F. (2019). Learning Style Based Teaching to Enhance Student Metacognition Skills (Review of Neuroscience Learning Theory). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 304, 467–472. https://doi.org/10.2991/acpch-18.2019.108
Güner, P., & Erbay, H. N. (2021). Metacognitive Skills and Problem-Solving. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(3), 715–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1594
Hu, J., Peng, Y., Chen, X., & Yu, H. (2021). Differentiating the learning styles of college students in different disciplines in a college English blended learning setting. PLoS ONE, 16(5), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251545
Irwansyah, R., & Mahfudy, S. (2021). Metakognisi siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Journal of Math Tadris (JMt), 1(02), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.55099/jmt.v1i02.32
Madhu, S., & Bhattachryya, D. (2023). Learning Styles Preferences among the Students. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i01.9015
Masegosa, A. R., Cabañas, R., Maldonado, A. D., & Morales, M. (2024). Learning Styles Impact Students’ Perceptions on Active Learning Methodologies: A Case Study on the Use of Live Coding and Short Programming Exercises. Education Sciences, 14(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030250
Mbato, C. L. (2019). Indonesian EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking in Reading: Bridging the Gap between Declarative, Procedural and Conditional Knowledge. Jurnal Humaniora, 31(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v31i1.37295
Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (2003). The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students’ mathematical reasoning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709903322591181
Miles, M. B., Huberman A M, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis (H. Salmon, K. Perry, & L. Barret, Eds.; 3rd ed.). SAGE Publication, Inc.
Mulyaningsih, S., Muzdalipah, I., & Dewi, S. V. (2023). Analysis of Metacognition Skills in Terms of Mathematical Resilience. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI), 12(9), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.35629/7722-12097180
Rambe, K. N., & Sinaga Asmin, B. (2019). Analysis of Metacognitive Skills in Solving Mathematical Problems Reviewed from Students’ Learning Style. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(11), 780–793. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-11-5
Randver, L. (2025). Impact of Personalized Learning Pathways Based on Felder-Silverman Learning Styles on Students ’ Metacognitive Regulation Skills in Estonia. RESEARCH AND ADVANCES IN EDUCATION, 4(3), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2025.03.02
Rashid, A. B., Raja Ikram, R. R., Thamilarasan, Y., Salahuddin, L., Abd Yusof, N. F., & Rashid, Z. (2023). A Student Learning Style Auto-Detection Model in a Learning Management System. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, 13(3), 11000–11005. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.5751
Rasyid, F. (2023). Learning Styles, Self-Regulation and Reading Achievement: Evidence From Indonesia. CELTI: Conference on English Language Teaching, 257–273.
Rijal, S., Yani, A., Suryani, S. D., & Upe, A. (2023). Identify Student Learning Styles in the New Normal Era: Study on Prospective Biology Teachers. Al-Islhlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 5583–5592. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.2618
Sobkow, A., Traczyk, J., Kaufman, S. B., & Nosal, C. (2018). The structure of intuitive abilities and their relationships with intelligence and Openness to Experience. Intelligence, 67(12), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.12.001
Soloman, B. a, & Felder, R. M. (2012). Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire. NC STATE UNIVERSITY, 5, 1–5. http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html
Tabuyo, A. T. (2024). Metacognition and Mathematical Problem-solving Performance of Pre-service Teachers. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(4), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.04.45
Teng, F. (2020). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(5), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493
Tralisno, A. (2022). Metakognisi Mahasiswa Dengan Gaya Belajar Reflektif Terhadap Pemecahan Masalah Dalam Perkuliahan Matematika Diskrit. JURNAL INOVASI EDUKASI, 5(2), 77–84.
Wang, F., Meng, F., Liu, S., Wang, S., Pan, L., & Lin, Z. (2022). Understanding Learners’ Metacognition of Online Teacher Feedback Amid COVID-19: A Case Study in a University Livestream Instruction Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.861845
Xing, B. (2023). A Review of Research on Learning Style. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 13(02), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2023.132016
Yadav, D. K., & Bhatia, D. (2024). Effect of Reflective Practices on Student Learning in Higher Education—A Real Life Approach. International Journal of Educational Reform, 33(3), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879221094298
Yousef, D. A. (2019). Exploring the reliability and validity of the learning styles questionnaire (LSQ) in an Arab setting. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(4), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-10-2018-0113
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Research in Education and Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material.
The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
